Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Nightmare on Cohen Street
In the seven theses of "Monster Culture," Cohen takes an intriguing perspective on the homosexual and racial essences of the story, King Kong. While previously arguing monsters represent a fearful image of some alter perspective counteractive to the societal norm. Then in his fifth thesis Cohen asks the reader if the idea of a monster could reflect the barrier of the possible. For my Greatest Monster I chose to write about Freddy Krueger, the ghost-dream killer from Nightmare on Elm Street. His claim to fame was a leather-glove on his right hand brandishing 6" knives, with which he would brutally slay the classic group of teenagers. In the movie it turned out Freddy had been a child murderer before being hunted down and burned alive, but in the original script Freddy had actually been a child molester. Now both these interests personal to Freddy are very out of the norm for the general public. However, the fact that it was changed gives a slight aura of creepiness to the entire argument Cohen has between monster and societal border. After all, Freddy is a killer in peoples' dreams. A place usually thought of as happy and safe. Beds are related to as comfortable and warm. Another place usually generalized with these properties is childhood. While looking at this through the eyes of Cohen, I'd think he'd perceive a relationship between childhood abuse/molestation and reverberating psychological issues afterward.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFreddy Krueger is about as terrifying of a monster as there could be. He is definitely in a category crisis because I don't even know what you would call somebody who lives in other people's dreams. Is he still part human, even though you could barely call him a human while he was still living on Earth? Honestly, if anybody knows if there is a word for Freddie Krueger's species/ state of being besides "monster," it would be interesting to know.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, how are you supposed to prepare to fight a monster that you can only see in your dream? In this way, he has a fleeting presence, which is another one of Cohen's theses about how the monster always escapes. This just adds to the terror aspect of trying to destroy a creature that has the advantage of choosing when to appear.